| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Oppressors–oppressed distinction ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Oppressors–oppressed distinction
Oppressors–oppressed distinction or dominant-dominated opposition, is an influential political argument. One of its first uses was by Hegel in his 1802 ''The German Constitution'', in which he said that "The Catholics had been in the position of oppressors, and the Protestants of the oppressed."〔Translated by H B Nisbet for Cambridge University Press. Original quote: 〕 Its use by Karl Marx made it very influential, and it is often considered a fundamental element of Marxist analysis.〔Kauppi (1996) p.61〕〔Derrida (1994), ch.2 Conjurying--Marxism p.55〕 The applications of it to some contexts have led some to consider their simplicity suspicious or dubious.〔 Many authors have reprised it and readapted it to other contexts, including Engels, Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Antonio Gramsci, Simone Weil, Paulo Freire and others. It has been used in a variety of contexts, including bourgeoisie versus proletariat, imperialism versus self-determination, the Israeli–Palestinian conflict,〔Halabi (2004) pp.59, 74-6〕〔Gordon (1991) p.145〕 and others.
==Imperialism and self-determination ==
The theory of oppressor and oppressed nations has been part of Lenin's thought on imperialism, self-determination and criticisms of Social Democrats.〔Lenin (1927)〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Oppressors–oppressed distinction」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|